# Tesla to volts

• Photo
• How much voltage and amperage do Tesla battery packs have? - Quora
• Video
• RELATED PAGES
• volt second to tesla meter² (V·s—T·m²) measurement units conversion.

Instant free online tool for tesla square meter to volt second conversion or vice versa. The tesla square meter [T*m^2] to volt second [V*s] conversion table and.

Convert Tesla. Tesla. V/m. dBuV/m. dBuA/m. pT. dBpT. Guass. A/m. mW/cm^2. W/ m^2. Need Help? click here. Please visit MEDIASERVANT.INFO for all of your RF.

Now the hard part. What's the voltage of a car battery? As far as amperage goes, that would put the different battery packs as follows:. At what voltage does the Model S motor work? DHrivnak 20 March

## From [Volts/meter] to [Tesla] and back

R ecall the introduction of electric field E from the measurement of electrostatic force F on charge q. T he finite value of "lightspeed" c in relativity requires that any force between objects depend on the frame of observation, so that for example a neutral current-carrying wire will not be neutral to a moving charge. That is, the moving charge experiences a Coulomb force. For an isolated charge q this expression works only for low speeds in the absence of acceleration, but for steady currents in a closed loop the expression is robust.

The magnitude of q m is the effective charge deficit seen by us as co-moving charges increase their speed 2 , while the magnitude of B' is the force exerted on a charge vector perpendicular to B ', per unit q m. T hus magnetic interactions can be fully expressed using only Coulomb's constant k, your favorite unit for electric charge, and familiar mechanical units for force, distance, etc. In this way magnetic fields might be seen as electric fields that are caused by, and act on, charge vectors instead of charges.

The form of the equations for magnetic fields and forces mirror those for electrostatics cf. The role of the force-law in each equation is easy to see. Electric and magnetic expressions for field energy U per unit volume V also fit together nicely, i.

T o see if B' offers some complementary perspective, try answering these questions. Why is ionization less of a concern in the presence of that magnetic field? A word of caution as well: If this is integrated over a closed current loop, the disparity vanishes. In the process, however, this observation highlights a shortcoming in what we tell intro-physics students by ignoring e.

However, vector potential is avoided in most intro texts. Given that, what is the strength in [Coulombs] of a typical refrigerator magnet? In a neutral wire, of course, that proper force itself is canceled by complementary non-moving charge elements, leaving only magnetic interactions to consider. The cross-products in the equations above take into account the fact that each deficit charge impacts only that component of force perpendicular to its vector direction.

Thus rather than drop Biot-Savart out of the blue on intro-physics students, the relativistic frame-dependence of force can be used to explain why and how currents in neutral wires interact with one another but not with scalar charges, including from their deficit character why parallel currents attract. According to the 3rd edition preface, the tension between SI and Gaussian units resulted in division of Jackson's book across two unit systems and the betrayal of a pact between friends.

What are other pros and cons of making this shift, at least for intro physics classes eager for the clearest possible view of nature's interconnections? Like proper-time and proper-length , they describe quantities from the vantage point of a special frame, in this case the frame of the object to which the acceleration and forces are applied.

Their magnitude also happens to be the Lorentz-invariant magnitude of the acceleration and net force four-vectors seen from all frames , since in the rest frame of the accelerated object the time-like component of these four-vectors is zero. Because forces might be caused by objects moving with respect to one another, proper force F o doesn't obey an action-reaction principle like 4-vector and locally-defined frame-variant forces do.

The equivalence principle of general relativity, combined with the concept of local affine-connection or geometric forces, makes these quantities useful even in non-inertial settings like gravitationally-curved spacetime. The utility of Newton's Laws for describing gravity on earth as "just one more inter-object force" is living proof of that, since gravity like magnetism is an example of everyday relativity.